Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 03:26

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Coating satellites with super-black paint Vantablack could help fight light pollution crisis - Space
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Creatine supports brain and muscle health during every stage of life - Earth.com
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
With 2026 World Cup a year away, the USMNT is directionless - Yahoo Sports
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Doctors Have Been Saying Sugar Is Bad – But They Missed This - SciTechDaily
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Apple Seeds Second Developer Betas of iOS 26 and iPadOS 26 - MacRumors
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why paracetamol – one of the world’s most common painkillers – works - The Jerusalem Post